IP Decisions
Subject | [Patent] Patent Court Decision, 2015Heo7889, decided February 3, 2016(Tadalafil Formulation Case) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Writer | Á¤º¸°ø°³´ã´çÀÚ | Date | 2018.02.12 | Hit | 692 |
Attachments | 2017_[3]2015Heo7889.pdf | ||||
Patent Court Decision, 2015Heo7889, decided February 3, 2016 (Tadalafil Formulation Case)
It is determined that inventiveness is not denied if a specific administration method or dosage maintains the medicinal effect while minimizing toxicity and side effects yet has advantageous effect that came from the specific administration method or dosage without any special circumstances which is out of scope of predictability that a person with ordinary skills would not conceive from prior art or publicly known inventions as optimizing the dosage, administration cycle, and administration method within the scope of no toxicity and side effect for desirable treatment effect to solve the task of medicinal effect increase and reduction of side effect for publicly known drugs belongs within the scope of creative ability of a person with ordinary skills by principle |
Previous | [Patent] Patent Court Decision, 2016Heo4498, ... |
---|---|
Next | [Patent]Patent Court Decision, 2016Heo7695, d... |